Harmony Tan vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Tan vs A. Carolina Nava Elkin

Harmony Tan
FRA
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
27
-
Height
-
238
C. Rank
886
90
Best Rank
867
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$638.7K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
MEX
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
27
-
Height
-
238
C. Rank
886
90
Best Rank
867
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$638.7K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Tan 1 - 0 Elkin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Harmony Tan winning 2 and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin winning 0. The last match between Harmony Tan and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin was at the W35 Petit-Bourg, 16-01-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Harmony Tan getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tan | 1 |
| Elkin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Petit-Bourg(01-16-25)
Harmony Tan
6
6
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
1
3
H. Tan vs A. C. N. Elkin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $638,698 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.71% (395-314) | Career Total W/L | 31.75% (40-86) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Tan vs A. C. N. Elkin Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Harmony Tan has won 40.20% of points on their second serve, while Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has won 32.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Harmony Tan, in recent form, has won 48.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has won 54.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.21% and 33.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Harmony Tan has saved 53.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has saved 37.50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Harmony Tan has won 65.06% of matches played (W/L 54/29), with Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin winning 19.44% (W/L 7/29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Harmony Tan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 19/11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 130/128). Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 24/39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Harmony Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.50% of matches (W/L 54/26), where as Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25.00% of matches (W/L 6/18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Harmony Tan winning 1 times and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Harmony Tan winning 2 and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin winning 0.
- The last match between Harmony Tan and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin was at the W35 Petit-Bourg, 16-01-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Harmony Tan getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:6.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Harmony Tan has played against opponents with an average rank of 361.36 while Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has played against players with an average rank of 229.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Harmony Tan has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Harmony Tan has converted 40.60% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has converted 42.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Harmony Tan vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Tan vs A. C. N. Elkin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:6 | Average Match Time | 1:17:6 |
| 49% (23/47) | 1st Serve % | 59% (33/56) |
| 83% (19/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 57% (32/56) | Return Points Win % | 32% (15/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tan 48%, Elkin 38%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tan 56%, Elkin 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Tan 57%, Elkin 41%.
H. Tan Recent Matches Played
A. C. N. Elkin Recent Matches Played

H. Tan vs A. C. N. Elkin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.71% (395/314) | YTD Win/Loss | 31.75% (40/86) |
| 55.58% (881/704) | Sets Win/Loss | 35.00% (98/182) |
| 52.73% (7367/6605) | Games Win/Loss | 43.03% (1055/1397) |
| 56.47% (131/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 26.23% (16/45) |
| 50.39% (130/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.10% (24/39) |
| 60.85% (115/74) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 63.33% (19/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1124 | Aces Total | 115 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1233 | Total Double Faults | 440 |
| 1:13:46 | Average Match Time | 1:4:58 |
| 492.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.87 |
| 58% (21337/36831) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3045/5175) |
| 63% (13410/21337) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (1665/3045) |
| 46% (7083/15494) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (859/2130) |
| 50% (2285/4586) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (256/535) |
| 46% (16631/35786) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2128/4978) |
| 38.89% (14/22) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.62% (26/35) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.17% (255/199) | Challenger W/L | 32.56% (28/58) |
| 64.86% (96/52) | Futures W/L | 30.00% (12/28) |
| 57% (388/683) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (40/126) |
| 10% (1/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (63/120) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 49% (86/175) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (10/28) |
| 86% (399/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (47/36) |
| 13% (399/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (47/11) |
| 16% (309/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (79/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:10 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
1.86
W2
1.82
10:30 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
1.39
W2
2.72
01:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.8
W2
1.37
09:15 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
1.44
W2
2.55
12:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.25
W2
3.48
04:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.35
W2
1.51
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Beibit Zhukayev Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico